AskDrSears - The Vaccine Book: Is there a link between vaccines and autism?

Is there a link between vaccines and autism?

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Let me start off by saying up front that I'm not going to answer this question. And now I'm going to take 5 paragraphs to explain why.

Autism is the main worry that is on every parent's mind when it comes to deciding about vaccines. On one side we have 99% of the medical community and worldwide researchers reassuring us that vaccines have no link to autism. On the other side are tens of thousands of parents who have watched their children regress into autism between age 1 and 2. And these parents are becoming more and more vocal, like Jenny McCarthy.

What research are worried parents basing their beliefs on? Some research has shown that the measles virus in the MMR vaccine, which is given at age 1, may be one of the "triggers" that begins the cascade of intestinal inflammation that leads to brain inflammation and autism. In addition, environmental chemical exposures like pollution in air, food and water (and possibly the various chemicals in vaccines), as well as genetic susceptibilities and immune problems, may also play a role in autism.

The problem is, no mainstream researcher has yet to PROVE that vaccines are a contributor to autism. And because vaccines play an important role in preventing disease, we will need some pretty solid proof that vaccines contribute to autism before some will be taken off the market. Right now the Centers for Disease Control's official statement (paraphrased) is that autism is clearly on the rise, that there is not enough evidence to prove a link between autism and vaccines, and that further research is being done on the matter.

Honestly, I've read ALL the research, and both sides present good data and good arguments. I'm not sure who is right at this point. Until I see enough evidence that shows vaccines are linked to autism, I certainly am not going to tell anyone that vaccines contribute to autism. But at the same time I can't say for sure that vaccines absolutely do NOT play any role at all in contributing to autism.

So what should parents do in the meantime while this issue continues to be investigated? You have two choices. Either you continue vaccinating so your child has disease protection while this issue is studied, which will probably take at least a few years, OR you stop vaccinating (or be more choosy about vaccines) until further research gives us answers one way or the other. I can't tell you what to do because I don"t know. I encourage everyone to read all the research and educate themselves about vaccines and diseases and make their own decision.

Labels: Vaccines and Autism

50 Comments:

At October 9, 2007 2:03 PM , Wendy Callahan said...

He says he researched vaccines? I’d like him to explain how injecting some of the most toxic chemicals i.e. formaldehyde and aluminum and mercury (no, its not all out) along with a half dead/live virus grown in monkey kidney tissue and aborted fetal cells is somehow helpful inside an immune system no one on the planet understands. Until there is a full explanation other than ‘it saves lives’ I’ll pass thanks…..
At October 9, 2007 4:59 PM , Patricia said...

You've read all the research, Dr. Sears? And you still don't know how this game is being played? Perhaps you need to look back at all the testimony at the Institute of Medicine's hearing in 2004. 16 scientists turned out to testify. Someone got the bright idea they should poll the scientists as to their bias. Four scientists worked for the pharmaceutical companies and could see no correlation whatsoever between autism and thimerosal- even when the other scientists pointed out how they'd skewed their studies- cooked the books.

The next two scientist said they had no conflict of interest, but others insisted they'd worked for the pharm. mfg in the past. Their finding were inconclusive.

The last ten scientists- MD's, geneticists, bio-chemists etc all found a direct correlation between autism and thimerosal. That's 10 to 4 or 10 to six at the very least.

The problem was that they forgot to poll the panel for their conflicts of interests. They dared come back two months later and say that based on a couple of well designed studies (the fraudulent vaccine mfg. studies)they couldn't see any link between mercury and autism. That's our tax dollars hard at work.

Vaccines don't work and never have. Check the epidemiology studies- they show all of the contagious diseases were in steady and significant decline decades before vaccines were popular. "Official data shows that large scale vaccination has failed to obtain any significant improvement of the diseases against which they were supposed to provide protection."
-Dr. Albert Sabin, developer of the oral polio vaccine. He should know!
At October 10, 2007 3:32 AM , Elza van Swieten said...

It is just not fair. Most of the research is done by the pharmaceutical companies themselves! How can a concerned parent pay for any proof? Or even a group of parents? There will never be any proof agains vacinnes because the power of the pharmaceutical industry is just too big.

I chose to vaccin my children only partical, I rather have no vaccins but my husband disagrees. We finally agreed on partial vaccination. Here in the Netherlands there is a lower amount of vaccins to be taken, but I urge all the parents to really think twice if all these vaccins are really nescesary. Probably not. Mind you that the same industry also does the education about vaccins, and think about how much they win for each vaccin your child is given. $$$$
At October 10, 2007 10:01 AM , Dr. Bob Sears said...

Wow - I can see that some of you feel very strongly about this. Now please don't shoot the messenger. I'm not a researcher, so I don't have my own research to fall back on. I must rely on other's research.

You've all made very good points - there is a lot of research that shows a possible connection. In the Book I give a summary of 11 of the studies that show a possible link.

BUT as a doctor I also can't ignore the studies that conclude they failed to show a link. Sure, some of those studies may be done by researchers who are biased. BUT not all of them are.

I am playing the role of impartial advisor. I will keep the public informed over the years as this unravels. I won't just report one side or the other. So, again, don't shoot the messenger. If you do, who is going to help present your side of the issues?
At October 10, 2007 11:13 AM , Patricia said...

The next question you have to ask yourself is do vaccines work? The overwhelming evidence says no. Do some research on the polio vaccines. You'll find that the elimination of polio was on paper only.

Before 1955, in preparation to release that vaccine, doctors were instructed to label any muscle fatigue as polio. Even if it was only accompanied by a heavy cold. The symptom only had to last 24 hours.

After the vaccine was released, physicians were instructed to code for polio of the muscle fatigue lasted 90 days. Whaddaya know! Lots of polio went away.

Also, in 1955 medical technology was developed to diagnose asceptic meningitis- which had all the same symptoms as polio. So if you got polio and were vaccinated, it was called meningitis. If you got polio and weren't vaccinated it was called polio. The number of meningitis cases in Los Angeles in 1966 are nearly identical to the number of polio cases in 1955. Did we get rid of any diseases? No. We just called it something else.

The polio vaccine actually increased the number of actual polio cases tremendously. This was so obvious to workers at the FDA that they refused to vaccinate their own families. When European countries notice the increase in polio in the US, they refused to use the vaccine, with the exception of Denmark.

Jonas Salk, inventor of the IPV, testified before a Senate subcommittee that nearly all polio outbreaks since 1961 were caused by the oral polio vaccine.

And while you're checking this out, Google SV#40 and cancer. That's the oncogenic simian virus they couldn't get rid of in the polio vaccines. The doctor who found it and noted it was cancer causing was promptly fired. Do you homework. You're child's health- both now and in their adult years, depends on it. Just type "vaccine damage" into Google and start reading.
At October 10, 2007 5:58 PM , Wendy Callahan said...

You think you are helping our side of the issue? Just tell the truth Dr Sears. There is no real research to back up vaccines work. It�s a huge experiment done on unsuspecting children. It should be stopped immediately until someone can prove you can poison yourself into immunity. Our kids are not expendable and should not be sacrificed to the sacred cow vaccination. You can�t just sit on the fence. Take a side and defend it. Hint: I�ll make it easy for you �..vaccines are indefensible�
At October 10, 2007 7:42 PM , Dr. Bob Sears said...

Wow, you two are very passionate. I have to admire that. But we must respectfully agree to disagree. Thanks for taking the time to write your thoughts.
At October 10, 2007 11:24 PM , Patricia said...

Why am I not surprised that you can't come up with any information to the contrary of what we've written. Just patting us on the heads as very passionate but misguided little women is pretty much par for the course. What an honest person would do is research the facts and show us where our passionate but misguided facts are wrong. Or are you afraid of the information that has caused many staunch pro-vax docs to defect to our side? As the former head of the NIH said- The only safe vaccine is the one you never give.

So how about it, Dr. Sears. Why don't you show us the fallacy of our arguments? You're readers would dearly love to see you refute us with some science and I'd love to be wrong. Show us!
At October 11, 2007 5:49 AM , Anonymous said...

Dr Sears, If you are going to respectfully disagree then you must have a reason for disagreeing. Maybe some science perhaps that you could share with us? Can you explain how injecting this filth is helpful to our childrens’ little bodies? Or like a religious cult gone bad do you only have your faith to sustain you?
At October 11, 2007 5:52 AM , Tenna Merchent said...

I am so sad about this. When I heard that Dr. Sears, the darling of La Leche League had written a book about vaccines, I thought "Finally, someone affiliated with LLL is taking a stand on vaccines!" But I was mistaken. His position is milk toast, saying he would never tell someone not to get vaccinated.

If you want to read a book that will actually inform you on the risks of vaccines I recommend Are Vaccines Safe and Effective by Neil Miller. And of course, my favorite book on recovering from vaccine damage is He's Not Autistic But...:How We Pulled Our Son From the Mouth of the Abyss by Tenna Merchent.
At October 11, 2007 6:49 AM , Becky said...

I personally am very appreciative for the book and the info. The fact that a well-known, respected, "mainstream" doctor is publicly saying that it is even a possibility is a plus. I think this will really open the eyes of many who never thought to question before. The alternative vaccine schedule could possibly save thousands of children from autism and/or a multitude of other problems, or at least lessen the impact of all those vaccines at once. I know it's not perfect, but it is a big step in the right direction. Thank you Dr. Sears!
At October 11, 2007 7:12 AM , Illinois Mom said...

My son is scheduled to receive the MMR, Dtap, Chicken Pox and flu shots at this 15-month appt later this month. I am pro-vaccination, but worry about giving his little body all of these shots at once -- especially since he's a boy and boy's have higher instances of autism. On the other hand, there is currently an outbreak of Measles in Michigan (we live in Illinois) that concerns me if it spreads.

My plan is to give him the flu shot (I'll verify it's mercury free) and the Dtap shot. I'll wait on the chicken pox and MMR until he's older (two or later). HOWEVER, I'd like to take this a step further and split the MMR shot into 3 separate shots. I haven't found a doctor willing to do this even though I'm willing to pay the extra cost and a friend of mine with an autistic son gave me information on a pharmacy out of NJ that will split the shots up with a doctor's prescription.

Dr Sears -- Do you have any thoughts on this plan? I plan on reading your book, but it comes out after my son's appointment.

While I respect every parent's right to make decisions on behalf of their children, this question is really for Dr. Spears. I'm not against vaccinations, I just want to go against the current schedule my doctor promotes.
At October 11, 2007 9:15 AM , Wendy Callahan said...

Dr Sears please don’t tell her it’s safer to separate the vaccines. Her little boy will get 3 times the chemicals doing that. Why don’t you tell her the MMR is made with aborted fetal cells and live virus that might persist in her babies gut for years and wreak havoc with his immune system and might not protect him from anything. Just tell her to make sure if she decides to do this the vial has a label that says ‘AVL free’. That way she will know the vaccine doesn’t contain the bird leukemia it has in the past.If you are trying to avoid disease like measles or mumps don’t inject them inside you giving this filth access to your organs.
At October 11, 2007 9:47 AM , illinois mom said...

Wendy I respect that you have strong opinions and that's great that you can make decisions for your children. However, I am not going to take the advice of a poster that I know nothing about on health issues for my children. Dr. Sears is a pediatric MD and I'll take his opinions into consideration -- along with information from other sources that I know and respect.
At October 11, 2007 9:56 AM , Yelena said...

Dr. Sears,
I was a La Leche League leader for a few years and was one of your biggest advocates when it came to pointing to someone within the medical establishment that really seemed to understand natural birth, breastfeeding and good parenting. Unfortunately, after reading your article on the vaccine issue, i see now that you are in no wise any different then any of the other doctors caught up with BIG PHARMA. You MUST know fully well the ingredients in these vaccines....how can you , as a Christian 'healer' ever point to a vaccine and espouse their use? Did you not read the package insert? Did you forget that injecting children (and adults) with formaldehyde, anti-freeze, mercury derivatives, vaccines made from the cell-lines of aborted babies is TOXIC? How can you explain this except to admit that you have become just as dirty as any other allopath? I pray that you will rethink your words Dr. Sears and repent of the danger you are approving. I had for years held you and your wife up as examples of the 'good' in medicine. I'm sorry that those days will now be over.
At October 11, 2007 11:25 AM , Patricia said...

Illinois Mom- what's wrong with your child getting measles? That would give your child lifelong natural immunity to not only measles but some other diseases and certain cancers as well. A little Vit. A lessens the symptoms- emphasis- small amount.

Last year there was measles outbreak in Massachusetts. When I had my sister the nurse look into the matter a little deeper, she was forced to agree that vaccinated people were getting the measles. China had 100% of their population vaccinated against measles and still had an huge measles outbreak. At best the measles vax postpones getting measles until adulthood- when it's dangerous.

I may not have gone to med school and been educated by the pharmaceutical companies- but I did learn to read at an early age. I'm also do not have any children. I have no axe to grind here. I did my homework.

I can fully recommend Wendy Callahan's website, http://www.vaccinetruth.org She's compiled a staggering amount of information from refereed medical journal and peer reviewed articles. I challenge any physician to an honest debate with her.
At October 11, 2007 6:34 PM , Dr. Bob Sears said...

illinois mom - What I'm telling everybody who has an upcoming appointment before the book comes out is to simply delay your appointment, or at least delay the shots, until after you've read. It would be tough for me to offer you specific advice about your specific child, and I typically dont' tell anyone they should or should not get a specific vaccine at an upcoming appontment. i would encourage you to keep looking for a split MMR and don't give the measles component (if you even choose to give it) until he's at least a few years old.

Yelena and tenna merchant - are you kidding me? Of course I know all those ingredients are in the vaccines. and of course I know they can be dangerous to kids. That's what the book is all about. It's about assessing the risks of the vaccines versus the risks of the diseases. I would encourage you to actually read the book before taking shots at me. I look forward to hearing from you again.

patricia and anonymous - It's funny how you keep attacking me before even reading the book. You've no idea how much detail I go into in the book about the possible side effects of vaccines, what ingredients are potentially harmful, and the many reasons why parents don't choose a particular vaccine.

I can tell you that I know right now you won't like the book, because I don't just tell the risks of vaccines, I also share the risks of the diseases as well. I tell both sides of the story. Everyone who was hoping a Sears would right an anti-vaccine book will be sorely disappointed. But everyone who knows me knows how fairly and thoroughly written this book is. And i think they are probably laughing at all of you right now (except for Beck and Illinois mom).

Perhaps you would be happier contributing your comments to a more anti-vaccine website, but we do welcome your continued comments.

The reason I can't take the time to address each of your arguments is that some of it is in the book, but mostly because I have a wife and three kids, and just don't have the time.

And lastly, can someone please point out to me where I wrote "I would never tell anyone not to get vaccinated?" Cuz I've told plenty of people not to get vaccinated - someone who reacted poorly to a first shot, someone with severe medical conditions, and especially someone with autism or other types of developemental delay. That's a no-brainer.

Anyway, I'm glad you care enough to write, but I would encourage you to hold off until you've read more of what I've written.

Thanks!
At October 12, 2007 10:00 AM , Wendy Callahan said...

Dr Sears, I read your reply and I’m hoping that you can clarify a few points you made. The first one is:

i would encourage you to keep looking for a split MMR and don't give the measles component (if you even choose to give it) until he's at least a few years old.

Why would you encourage splitting up the MMR? Do you not think its safe in its current form? How old is a few years? The vaccine is given between 18 months and 2 yrs old. What age do you mean and why?

Of course I know all those ingredients are in the vaccines. and of course I know they can be dangerous to kids.

If you know this, why would there be any question in your mind about any child receiving a vaccination?

I also share the risks of the diseases as well.

Do you think a disease injected inside a child is safer than getting it naturally?

Cuz I've told plenty of people not to get vaccinated - someone who reacted poorly to a first shot, someone with severe medical conditions and especially someone with autism or other types of developemental delay. That's a no-brainer

So do you think vaccines have contributed to autism and developmental delays?

Anyway, I'm glad you care enough to write, but I would encourage you to hold off until you've read more of what I've written.

You mean like this?

Either you continue vaccinating so your child has disease protection while this issue is studied, which will probably take at least a few years,

Well, at least you admit there is no studies done on vaccines and there needs to be. I hope your book addresses these issues and doesn’t sugar coat them.
At October 13, 2007 9:07 AM , Patricia said...

Dear Dr. Sears,
I apologize if you feel that I have attacked you. Perhaps you're mistaking my frustration for hatefulness or anger. I realize the written word has its drawbacks over say a face to face conversation where you can hear a person's tone and see their facial expression.

That said, I have to say I find your reasons for not engaging me or others rather hollow. All we're asking for is some science. I've researched a large number of formerly pro-vax doctors and other physicians who became quite vocal in their opposition to mass vaccination. But to be honest, as compelling as the mountains of scientific evidence and statistics are, the thing that really got me were the moms. Moms who vaccinated their first child or two before finding out the truth about vaccines. They consistently report that they are astounded by the vibrant health of their unvaccinated child compared to their vax'd ones. No allergies, no asthma, no auto-immune diseases, ear infections, cancer nor behavioral and learning disorders. That was quite remarkable to me.

Right now I have to put you in the same category as a Jenny McCarthy. She's been on every national TV talk show from Oprah to Larry King discussing her son's vaccine induced autism and recovery. She even made the cover of People magazine. Many in the anti-vax movement find this encouraging. I couldn't agree less. It is Damage Control, pure and simple. The only reason the national media, which is the mouthpiece of the pharmaceutical industry, is promoting this actress and her book is to forward the vaccine agenda. They can no longer hide the reality that vaccines cause autism so they have her come out and say vaccines do cause autism- but they have saved so many lives. She's not opposed to vaccines, just in favor of safer ones. Hogwash! This is "copping to a lesser plea" in the Damage Control game.

Let me use an illustration to explain how it works. Say a man has been coming home at 4 a.m. several nights in a row, explaining to his wife that he's been working late. The wife, who wasn't born yesterday, gets suspicious and decides to investigate his claims. She catches him in a hotel bar with a scantily clad woman hanging all over him. His working late excuse is history, so he quickly regroups and cops to a lesser plea. "Yes, I was in the hotel bar and had a few drinks with that very attractive woman, but honestly, honey, you need to believe me when I say this- nothing happened. I didn't get a room and didn't have sex with her." The wife protests- "but the bar closed at 2 am and you haven't come home until 4 am." "I know that looks bad, but the reason she was at the bar is that she's going through a very difficult time and I was just being a friend and listening."

Our fictional wife here isn't stupid and sees right through his lame story. However, parents are bombarded with fear tactics and white coat syndrome and many fail to see what's really going on with vaccines. So I suppose I should congratulate you on being one of the chosen on the Damage Control Team.

The only true risk/benefit analysis: All the risk is to the parents and children, all the benefit is to the pharmaceutical companies and doctors.

You wrote- "Perhaps you would be happier contributing your comments to a more anti-vaccine website, but we do welcome your continued comments." Happier? No thanks, I get no pleasure from preaching to the choir.

"The reason I can't take the time to address each of your arguments is that some of it is in the book, but mostly because I have a wife and three kids, and just don't have the time. "

Well, Dr. Sears, the fact that you've just written a book on this should make it quite simple for you to cut and paste just a little of your science into this discussion. We're all busy- life is busy. You don't have to address each of our arguments- just one, backed up with some real science would make me deliriously happy.

I know you won't because you can't. When I saw the name of your site, AskDrSears.com I was under the mistaken impression that I could ask and you'd have an answer. Oh well, life is full of inconsistencies.

All the best to you and your family. BTW- did you and your family get a flu shot this year?
At October 16, 2007 7:06 AM , MrsCNLee said...

Dr Sears,
Thank you so much for writting this book! Even though I have not yet had the chance to read it, I'm SO glad that it is available. My husband (3rd yr DO student) and I(RN) have been digging through all the research for over a year now and are slowly developing a vaccination schedule that works for our family. I'm SO glad to see a book that addresses BOTH sides of this issue. I firmly believe that there is a happy medium out there. That we CAN have the best of both worlds. Thank you for working twords that.
I would like to say to the other posters... think about it ladies. He is just one doctor. And not even YOUR doctor. Is this really the most effective place to pick your battles? Why not get a hold of the doctors that conduct and publish the research, instead of a pediatrician that simply publishes a book ABOUT the research. Go straight to the horse's mouth, instead of arguing with the messenger. I DO think we vax too early, too much, and too often. But you dont see me attacking doctors who are just doing their best to help us wade through this mess safely. Take it up with the researchers and the policy-makers.
At October 16, 2007 11:08 AM , Carri, Lou & Josie Schneider said...

Dr. Sears,
Just a reminder:

"It's impossible to be everything to everyone...just know that you are something to someone."

Thanks for everything. We have a 9 week old baby & really appreciate your work.

Sincerely,
The Schneiders
Cincinnati, OH
At October 17, 2007 8:58 AM , Anonymous said...

Dr. Sears,
Thank you for being an educated professional who is able to say he doesn't know all the answers. In the end it is the parents who need to decide what is best for their children. My cousins vaccinated her first 4 kids and didn't vaccinate her last 3. She doesn't recommend either. *As parents we are responsible for the health and safety of our children. Whatever your decision is, be ready to except and live with that decision.*
At October 19, 2007 5:08 AM , Michele Davis said...

Hello Dr. Sears, Thank you for writing this book. I am looking forward to its release.

I had a question about breastfeeding as a strategy for delaying vaccination in very young children. Can I raise the levels of antibodies I have, say to Pertussis, by taking another vaccine? And would this provide additional protection to my infant ? I would like to delay vaccination until age two, but am concerned about some of the more common vaccine-preventable illness liking whooping cough.
At October 21, 2007 9:26 AM , Dr. Bob Sears said...

Thanks for all your comments. Very appreciated.

Patricia, you are right. I've sent passionate emails to people that were taken as angry, and the written word CAN be mistaken for anger quite easily. I look forward to hearing from you after you've had a chance to read through all the research I discuss in the book. Although the sections on autism in the book are somewhat short, IN THE RESOURCES AT THE BACK I DISCUSS AND SUMMARIZE 20 SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES THAT PRESENT THE RESEARCH ON VACCINES AND AUTISM.

Michele, you pose a very excellent question about passing vaccine-specific antibodies through breastfeeding OR even prenatally through the placenta.
We do know that babies get a lot of general immunity this way, but little is known about VACCINE-SPECIFIC immunity. I have heard some discussions from medical professionals about plans to vaccinate pregnant women against pertussis so that their mom can pass these antibodies along to a baby so the baby has pertussis protection for the first two months (before the first vaccine is given). Such protection would be expected to last about 9 months.
BUT PLEASE BE CLEAR - I'm not suggesting you do this yet. It's just something that the medical community is looking into. There are certainly some concerns over vaccinating pregnant women and exposing a fetus to vaccine chemicals.
At October 21, 2007 11:22 AM , phillipsmob said...

Dr. Sears,

Thank you for your research and for putting light on these epidemics. I never understood why some parents did not vaccinate until my now 4 year old son started being testing for autism. I just went with the "system" and did what we thought we were suppose to do. For my other son and our newborn daughter we are taking a very different approach to vaccinating. My husband and I appreciate your book and hardwork. Also, I wanted to thank you for the advice you gave me about my daughter who has infantile spasms.

Thanks again and God Bless!

phillipsmob
At October 22, 2007 11:42 AM , Michele Davis said...

Thank you Dr. Sears for your reply. It is the 22nd and I expect your new book to arrive soon! Thank you for all you do for families. May you be blessed.
At October 31, 2007 11:08 AM , em in so cal said...

I hope you all realize that this 'Dr. Sears' is not THE Dr. Sears, it's his son. At least, that's what I'm gathering when he said "wife and THREE kids."

Nevertheless, he is still a brilliant doctor. So, relax, and take a deep breath.

My son is 7 mos and still no shots, and perfectly healthy!
At November 5, 2007 7:19 AM , Anonymous said...

Dr. Sears

You never answered the question about the flu shot
Did you and your family recieve one this year?
At November 5, 2007 1:12 PM , Dr. Bob Sears said...

I generally don't answer what I do with my kids, but I can tell you that I don't get a flu shot myself. I've never had the flu, but honestly it's mostly because I'm scared to death of needles!
At November 10, 2007 9:32 PM , Anonymous said...

Dr.Sears,

My son is six months old and I would like him to not get the MMR vaccine. My husband is worried about how he is going to go to public school without having all of his vaccines.
At November 11, 2007 10:04 AM , dr. bob sears said...

This is addressed in the Book. The laws vary from state to state, but even states that require shots for school don't require they by done UNTIL school. so, if they make you get it, it won't be until kindergarten entry.
At November 11, 2007 7:35 PM , Susanne said...

I have to say, I find all of this terrifying. No matter how much research one does, the answer is not clear. We still have to deal with our pediatricians. We have a great one, but he is "doctor" and does not advocate changing the vaccination schedule. I did push and got a preservative free flu shot for my son who just turned one. All the other infant shots are preservative free. The problem is that everyone is passionate and we, the caring parent with limited time, are somewhat hostage to the system. How can we actually know? It always feels like a shot in the dark and that I am a partially informed parent that my doctor humors. We have gone through numerous issues like this. Mild Hip Dysplasia, Iron supplementation while breast-feeding, vaccinating or not. It is really tough! Iain, my son, has had most of his risky baby shots but, I will read your book, Dr. Sears. Both sides of the story from a trusted source would be helpful. May I just make an aside comment about the website...this has nothing to do about vaccines. I have used the website alot over the past year. Sometimes, when co-sleeping, breast-feeding, and all the attachment parenting things we were doing were under scrutiny or attack this website was my quick rescue and/or relief. I thank your whold family for that. I am now a member of API and have started an Attachment Parenting Group in our area. However, a criticism...the site is starting to feel like a money machine. There is always something being sold, forms to fill out about whether I want product information, and I just got hit with a formula pop up ad... A Formula...Similac, I think, pop-up. I hope that it doesn't get worse.

Thank you, though. For all that you all do.

I look forward to adding your book to my "Sears Library"
Susanne VetteMoseley
At November 11, 2007 7:35 PM , Susanne said...

I have to say, I find all of this terrifying. No matter how much research one does, the answer is not clear. We still have to deal with our pediatricians. We have a great one, but he is "doctor" and does not advocate changing the vaccination schedule. I did push and got a preservative free flu shot for my son who just turned one. All the other infant shots are preservative free. The problem is that everyone is passionate and we, the caring parent with limited time, are somewhat hostage to the system. How can we actually know? It always feels like a shot in the dark and that I am a partially informed parent that my doctor humors. We have gone through numerous issues like this. Mild Hip Dysplasia, Iron supplementation while breast-feeding, vaccinating or not. It is really tough! Iain, my son, has had most of his risky baby shots but, I will read your book, Dr. Sears. Both sides of the story from a trusted source would be helpful. May I just make an aside comment about the website...this has nothing to do about vaccines. I have used the website alot over the past year. Sometimes, when co-sleeping, breast-feeding, and all the attachment parenting things we were doing were under scrutiny or attack this website was my quick rescue and/or relief. I thank your whold family for that. I am now a member of API and have started an Attachment Parenting Group in our area. However, a criticism...the site is starting to feel like a money machine. There is always something being sold, forms to fill out about whether I want product information, and I just got hit with a formula pop up ad... A Formula...Similac, I think, pop-up. I hope that it doesn't get worse.

Thank you, though. For all that you all do.

I look forward to adding your book to my "Sears Library"
Susanne VetteMoseley
At November 14, 2007 9:12 PM , Elizabeth F. said...

Dr. Sears,
I agree with Becky. I am thankful that there is a well-respected doctor who is discussing this vaccine debate openly. I think that if more doctors start to do so it will encourage more research. While some are criticizing you for not taking a stand one way or the other, I appreciate your humbleness in admitting that you do not have all of the answers and I appreciate you telling parents to educate themselves.

I saw you speak at the LLL of NC Conference a few weeks ago. I got so much out of your presentation and I have told everyone that I know and my blog readers to go get your book! Thank you for all of your hard work and for bringing a balanced view.
At November 16, 2007 2:38 PM , dr bob sears said...

Suzanne and Elizabeth. Thanks for the nice comments. I hope to make a big difference in the way our nation vaccinates it's children.

Suzanne - I know what you mean about the adds. We delete any that we notice are innappropriate. The cost of running the site is very high, so we've had to rely on advertising. the only other option would be to charge a subscription. But no one does that. So, thanks for your thoughts and they are well-received.
At November 16, 2007 6:16 PM , Anonymous said...

Actually, your state can't "make" you get your child vaccinated.

You can sign a waiver, just as I did for my son. The waiver for our particular state was one claiming "religious exemption". I signed my name and now my son is in Kindergarten without having the so called "required" vaccinations. This little fact is unknown to most and that is quite sad. People believe that have to vaccinate or else homeschool their kids. That is incorrect. You can find out more information on the website for the National Vaccine Information Center on your particular state and the certain exemptions you can use by signing their waiver. Go to http://www.909shot.com/state-site/state-exemptions.htm and scroll down to view the info on your state.

Thanks,

Hadley
At November 30, 2007 1:01 PM , faithful mommy said...

Going a little bit on the outside looking in...
The fall of man (in the book of Genesis) included the onset of illness, diseases and death. You can choose to put your faith in Jesus who will restore all that has been lost and all that is wrong. He has already overcome these things and now we look forward to that blessed time when all these things will be reconciled. But for now, only for a while,though it may seem long for the moment, we partake in the sufferings of Christ. This life is temporary, and so are it's sufferings.
We will not be free of all these things, or the corrupted people and there ways, until the return of Christ.
God will wipe away every tear and suffers along side all that are hurting (be it a disease or anything else). I encourage you all to get to know your Creator (whether you have acknowledged Him or not). There are all the necessary answers to life in the Word(Bible). A wonderful man, Dr. Chuck Missler has addressed many of these issues(diseases, and world news) with a biblical world view, see Strategic Trends Update 2007 @ khouse.org.
Dr. Sears is a wonderful doctor, but is not God and is limited in his abilities as you and everyone else are, but it seems his desire is to be of real help to his patients. We have our limited awareness and education of what we know as far as science, but it is none the less a practice and is not 100% accurate. Only God can be that.

Now, faith is being assured of what we hope for, and the assurance of what we do not yet see.
At November 30, 2007 1:36 PM , Kim said...

Dr. Sears,

I have read many comments and I am grateful that so many people choose to research and discuss this issue openly. I have finished your book, along with Aviva Jill Romm's & Dr. Cave's (which are both great, if a bit dated.) While you maintain your position, I found your exposition regarding the contents of each vaccine, the companies that produce them, the reasons why some people opt out, and what you have witnessed in your practice, all to be very useful in my research. I greatly appreciated that you took the time to go into such detail in each chapter and to clearly delineate the controversies associated with each ingredient.

I understand this is an incredibly heated and important issue and regardless of whether you agree with people or not, I commend you for taking the time to maintain this website and respond to everyone.

There are many physicians and scientists who will not even address the debate on this issue. I have recently discussed vaccines with three pediatricians and was asked to leave a practice because we didn't want to follow the protocol currently recommended. We found a pediatrician who, like you, supports the current recommendations, but is willing to work with us, and to me, that is a start.

I found your book clear, concise, and thoughtful. Amidst so much fear-mongering and controversy, sometimes it is like weeding through a thick, dark jungle. If someone is unsure as to how to proceed, there is a lot of information out there that is not sensationalized to help one make a reasonable decision. I found your writing unpretentious and clear.

Thank you,
~Kim
At December 12, 2007 11:46 PM , dr. bob sears said...

Kim - thanks for the nice comment and well worded review.
At December 19, 2007 5:08 PM , Anonymous said...

Dear Dr. Sears,
I cannot understand why the vaccine issue is too hot for you or anyone else to handle. I believe that most new parents have no idea that their baby will recieve such an increased number of vaccines. If it isn't because of BIG PHARMA then why can't anyone discuss it openly and honestly?
My beautiful, NORMAL, healthy, speaking grandson went to the trusted pediatrician for a 15 mo. old well baby visit and received HIB, HepB, Chicken Pox, MMR, DTaP, and a fully loaded with Thimersol Flu shot, his third! Directly following he ran a fever of 105 degrees for days. We were told to give extra tylenol that he had probably just caught a virus. He lost all his language, started banging his head and running in circles humming. It was as if his soul went dark that day. The same pediatrician said this was all completely normal, he just needed to go to preschool. We weren't given the name of a Regional Center, no referral, no help, nothing. We had to do the research ourselves. This is a crime. Doesn't it say somewhere in a doctors oath "do no harm?"
Through God's grace we found Defeat Autism Now and our beautiful baby is recovering. One look at his labs and anyone with or without a medical degree could see the damage done was from that fateful day.
When will the truth be told?
At December 22, 2007 6:29 AM , Anonymous said...

Dr. Sears-what do you think of this?
The Huffington Post
Welcome | Edit preferences | Logout | December 22, 2007 Log In | Sign Up | December 22, 2007 Home Politics Media Business Entertainment Living More on HuffPost... Politics HuffPolitics OffTheBus Fundrace Media Eat The Press Business Entertainment Living All Blogs All News 23/6 23/6 Home > The Blogs > Deirdre Imus Site Web
Deirdre Imus
BIO Become a Fan Get Email Alerts Similar Bloggers
Missing the Mercury Threat: An appeal to New Jersey's Governor
Posted December 21, 2007 | 04:57 PM (EST)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read More: Autism Vaccine Mercury, Childrens' Vaccines, New Jersey, Vaccine Mercury, Breaking Politics News

Albert Einstein once said, "only two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity". We got a good dose of what many would call "human stupidity" last week in New Jersey when 5 un-elected members of the Public Health Council (PHC) voted to mandate four new vaccines for children. The vaccines that will be mandated in 2008 include: the influenza vaccine, pneumococcal, meningococcal, tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertusis (Tdap) vaccine. Two of the vaccines, influenza and Sanofi Pasteur's meningococcal vaccine (Menomune) contain thimerosal (mercury).

Email
Print
Comment
In spite of a week's long protest from constituents that included parents, physicians and dozens of organizations, the State Health Commissioner gave his "seal of approval" on Friday, December 15.

Today I want to appeal to New Jersey Governor Corzine to re-evaluate these recommendations and carefully consider the ramifications for New Jersey's children.

Unless Governor Corzine, the state legislature, or perhaps a judge intervenes, New Jersey will go down in history as the first state in the nation, for that matter the world, to order parents to vaccinate their preschoolers with a known developmental neurotoxin, which many parents, physicians and scientific research suggest is linked to the epidemic of developmental disorders, including autism.

The PHC recommendation came just days before another "first in the nation" law was passed by Minnesota lawmakers who voted to ban the use of mercury in mascara and other cosmetics. "Mercury does cause neurological damage to people even in tiny quantities...can retard brain development in children and fetuses who are most vulnerable to the metal's toxic effects" stated the Minnesota officials.

That's right, you can't put mercury on your mommy's lashes in Minnesota but New Jersey health officials just can't wait to inject it into your young children.

After repeated warnings about mercury toxicity in fish and following its removal from over the counter products, thermostats, industrial switches, medical devices, animal vaccines, even a leg paint used on horses, the five appointed members of the PHC and the NJ Department of Health (DOH) can claim credit for what could be one of the worst and ill-advised public health decisions forced upon the public in recent memory; a decision that was made under a cloak of secrecy, without sufficient debate and perhaps in violation of procedural protocols.

New Jersey parents have a right to question the DOH actions. After all New Jersey holds the dubious honor of having the highest autism rates in the country. According to the

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), one in 94 New Jersey children have autism, 1 in 60 boys.

While some NJ public health officials arrogantly dismiss the link between vaccines and autism as "scientifically unfounded," and tell reporters concerns about thimerosal is "a moot issue," since most vaccines are either free of the compound or contain only trace amounts, like the preschool flu vaccine.", a growing body of published scientific research shows this opinion cannot be factually supported.

To the contrary, approximately 90% of the influenza vaccine supply still contains thimerosal. According to the FDA, the 25 micrograms of mercury in one influenza vaccine is NOT a "trace amount". According to EPA guidelines, this amount can only be considered safe if a person weighs 550 pounds. You would think a health official would know this.

In addition, there is no convincing evidence that the flu shot is actually effective. A study published in the British Medical Journal, done by the Cochran Collaboration, considered the Gold Standard for scientific research, stated the recommendations of flu shots for infants and toddlers are not backed by scientific evidence [Jan.25, 2006]. So if research tells us the vaccine is ineffective and it contains toxic mercury, why are officials recommending it be given to our young children?

Sanofi's Menactra meningococcal vaccine is thimerosal-free and currently recommended for children between 11-12 years old. However, the FDA and the CDC are investigating cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) among adolescents who received this vaccine. A larger study led by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare is expected to take approximately 2 years. According to the CDC, "The study period is necessary to accumulate cases and attain sufficient statistical power."

The recommended acceptable alternative is Sanofi's Menomune, which contains 25 micrograms of thimerosal, thus adding to the overall body burden of one of the most toxic metals on earth.

While some officials want to continue dismissing the vaccine autism association, the neurological risks associated with the use of the mercury-based preservative have been well documented in the scientific literature for decades.

This is noted in a 2004 California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment that found: "the scientific evidence that [thimerosal] cause reproductive toxicity is clear and voluminous...The evidence for its reproductive toxicity includes severe mental retardation or malformations in human offspring who were poisoned when their mothers were exposed to ethyl mercury or thimerosal while pregnant ...

The National Toxicology Program (NTP) states that thimerosal is "poison by ingestion, subcutaneous, intravenous and possibly other routes," and warns that childhood exposure could result in "mental retardation in children, loss of coordination in speech, writing, gait, stupor, and irritability and bad temper progressing to mania."

A 1984 study published in the Journal of Pediatrics found, "Thimerosal used to irrigate the external auditory canals in a child with tympanostomy tubes has caused severe mercury poisoning." [Rohyans J, Walson PD, Wood GA, MacDonald WA Mercury toxicity following Merthiolate ear irrigations. J Pediatr 1984; 104:311-313].

In 2001 the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published a review on the state of science related to mercury toxicity entitled, Technical Report: Mercury in the Environment: Implications for Pediatricians. The Report concluded, "Mercury in all of its forms is toxic to the fetus and children"..."Inorganic and elemental mercury should not be present in the home or other environments of children" "It would seem prudent for the FDA to carefully examine all uses of mercury in pharmaceuticals, particularly pharmaceuticals that are used by infants and pregnant women." [J Pediatr 2001; 108: 197-205].

As recently as last month a study published in the Journal of Child Neurology determined, "a significant relation does exist between the blood levels of mercury and diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder".

New Jersey's health officials may believe giving preschoolers and other children mercury containing influenza shots is good public health policy but not all physicians would agree. Many physicians, including United States Congressman Dave Weldon (R-FL), a strong supporter of our nation's immunization program, has gone on record stating, "Any doctor who would knowingly inject a baby with a mercury-containing vaccine. I would consider that malpractice".

If these are not reason enough to question the new mandates, just last month one of the first autism cases presented in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (vaccine court), the government CONCEDED that vaccines aggravated a pre-existing mitochondrial dysfunction causing autistic like symptoms in one of the first cases where the case filed was a claim was that thimeosal caused autism.

So please don't tell me the link between vaccines and autism is "scientifically unfounded," or there is "no evidence" that vaccines cause autism in some children. The federal government has already conceded this point in one case.

Mercury is not the only problem with the new mandates.

The Prevar pneumococcol vaccine also has its own problems. There have been 3,243 adverse reactions reported to the government's vaccine surveillance system since Prevnar was first licensed in 2000. These reports included 476 serious reactions and 79 deaths. Just a few months ago the Prevnar vaccine was linked to a new antibiotic resistant "superbug" bacterial infection, causing serious ear infections in children as young as 6 months. One child suffered permanent hearing loss.

Should health officials be forcing parents to give their children vaccines that contain a heavy metal toxin whose packaging contains the universal symbol for poison and warns the product could cause mental retardation or one that has thousands of reported adverse reactions? Where do we draw the line on who knows what is best for our own children?

In response to the Public Health Council's recommendations, Governor Corzine was quoted that he does not "in any way think we should take risks on vaccines . . . the elements of evaluation should be left to scientists and data".

I couldn't agree more with Governor Corzine on this point. Ultimately it is the Governor who is responsible and I am hopeful that he is taking this matter very seriously.

No governor wants to reject the recommendations of their public health officials, However, Governor Corzine would not be the first one to do so in this situation.

When faced with the recommendation by California health officials to veto a bill aimed at banning thimerosal from children's vaccines back in 2004, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger rejected this advice and signed the Mercury Free Act, which strictly limits the amount of mercury in vaccines or products used by pregnant women and very young children in the state of California. In a signing message, Schwarzenegger stated, "I believe that an abundance of caution merits the acceleration of the process already underway to remove thimerosal from the last few vaccines that contain it".

Six other governors have signed into law similar bills overruling the objections of public health officials.

Look, everyone knows what these new recommendations are all about. MONEY, MONEY AND MORE MONEY!

Vaccines have become the lifeblood of the pharmaceutical industry.

In the 2004 annual report for Chiron Corporation, sales of their flu vaccine went from $90 million in 2002 to $332.4 million in 2003. Total vaccine sales went from $357.4 million (2002) to $678.3 million (2003). Nice increase.

I note this particular year's report because it was in 2003 that industry, along with health officials, aggressively forged ahead with a masterful marketing plan. Create fear that terrible diseases are going spread through schools like wildfires if every kid isn't vaccinated through a very well financed lobbying and advertising campaign. Then get a handful of health officials; to "rubber stamp" exactly what the industry wants. What corporation wouldn't covet a program sanctioned by the government that forces the public to use their products? ['Dire' CDC warning hiked flu shot demand: UPI, 10/15/04]

The profits from mandated vaccines has resulted in billions of profits for the drug companies and if enacted, the new vaccine recommendations will deliver billions more.

An easy and guaranteed flow of revenue for industry and physicians alike.

It wouldn't surprise me at all to learn that certain members of the Public Health Council were the recipients of pharmaceutical industry generosity. (Riki Jacobs - received Pfizer money for her AIDS foundation).

For the record, I have repeatedly acknowledged the importance of vaccinations. There is no question that vaccines have saved many lives but they are not without risks. Over the last decade, however, serious and legitimate questions have arisen regarding the number of vaccines we are giving our children today and whether the ingredients in those vaccines are as safe as we, the public, have been led to believe. Until these safety concerns are addressed in a transparent manner, parents, not bureaucrats, should decide what is best for their children.

In January of this year, in response to mercury contamination at a children's day care center, Governor Corzine signed a bill that would enforce strict guidelines to ensure environmental safety at child care centers and schools. In a statement Governor Corzine said. "This puts New Jersey at the forefront of states nationally in protecting children from environmental contaminants while at child care facilities and schools."

It would be the height of hypocrisy for New Jersey to now tell parents they must inject their children with mercury-containing vaccines.

It is time for New Jersey to lead the nation again and reject the new vaccine mandates and send a message that our children are no longer going to be the depositories for toxic contaminants in order to increase profits for the pharmaceutical industry.

Any parent who wants to vaccinate their child with any of the four new recommended vaccines can do so today without government coercion. The state has not needed to mandate these vaccines in the past and there is no public health emergency to warrant the implementation of the recommendations now. There is however a public health crisis in New Jersey caused by the rapid rise of developmental disorders, like autism.

There can be no harm in slowing down this process and carefully reviewing the mandated recommendations along with the current state of science, and the possible ramifications of this very aggressive vaccination policy.

The new vaccine mandates are not defensible in light of all we know about thimerosal and mercury toxicity. Governor Corzine has the legal authority and the responsibility to protect New Jersey's children from additional and unnecessary mercury exposure.

I urge Governor Corzine to put on hold these new vaccine mandates and convene a meeting that will include ALL stakeholders and hear from scientists and his constituents before approving these new vaccine mandates.

The ball is in your court Governor.
At January 17, 2008 9:56 AM , fwb said...

Dr. Sears: I read your book and appreciate the insight (my wife bought the book). We have 2 boys, ages 7 and 4. My wife strongly believes that my oldest was vaccine-injured (age 2), when he starting showing signs of autistic type behavior. We did have him evaluated and, in fact, he was diagnosed with autism. Although, I can honestly tell you, that, if you were to meet him, I don't think you'd know. My own opinion is that he doesn't have it and he was mis-diagnosed. In any event, on the scale he would be considered a high-functioning, Aspergers-type. My point in this note is that we haven't vaccinated my 4 year old - nothing, nada, zip. And he has had no ill effects of not having been vaccinated, So, of course, a part of me wonders if all the vaccination is "much ado about nothing" or we've just been very very lucky. We are considering giving him some vaccines that would be more important for him. But as of now, we haven't done anything. I'd be interested in your comments . . . or those of others posting here. Thank you for the book. I found it to be very concise - a good reference manual, if you will.
At February 9, 2008 9:26 AM , laura said...

I love how people get on here and spout things and no one, who makes claims, cites sceintific research or published journals ( aborted fetal cells epidmeiology studies)
but to that note, a lot of scientific research is open to interpretation as well. While one person may read it and get one thing from a study, someone else may turn it a completly different way.
I tend to one to take advice for scienctist and doctors who have actually done resaerch and study on the topic rather than Hollywood and parents who just read stuff online~
At February 27, 2008 5:52 PM , Anonymous said...

Laura

If you think that these pediatricians that give our kids shots do research your wrong. they do what they are told . Most don't even know the brands of shots they carry.If that's what you meant.

Common sense tells you it's not good to inject all of these poisons into little ones. And the pharms come up with as many vaccines as possible to make their money.

One size doesn't fit all and these vaccines are causing problems. You don't need to be a doctor or a researcher to know that! You can be a parent or a Hollywood star. You can even be an idiot!
At March 2, 2008 7:55 PM , Anonymous said...

Dr. Bob,
Your unbiased and honest opinion on the vaccine debate is appreciated by some of us less angry people. I respect the fact that you refuse to pursuade parents one way or the other and rather choose only to give the plain hard truth backed by research studies. I'm sorry that some people are so angry and choose to use this valuable website as a way of sharing their "issues" with people who are simply looking to a well respected Dr. for his opinion.
Please don't stop sharing your knowledge with us bacause of these sour apples.
At June 9, 2008 10:11 PM , anti-vax said...

All vaccines are poisons and poisons are never safe and will never be. Thus, they are absolutely worthless and dangerous. Think about it!
“Doctors put drugs of which they know little, into bodies of which they know less, for diseases of which they know nothing at all.” Voltaire
......discussing vaccination with a doctor is like discussing vegetarianism with a butcher........... George Bernard Shaw
At August 7, 2008 4:55 PM , Anonymous said...

Dr. Sears,

I have read your book. Many thanks.

Would you please tell us if you ever had your kids vaccinated?

I know you don't like personal questions, but the answer is very important for all of us, at least to see your honesty in (partially) defending vaccines.

Greatly appreciated,
John Layy, PhD
At January 10, 2009 8:11 PM , Taz said...

After reading all of the comments, I no longer want to vaccinate my children any more. My question is, what's the worst that can happen if I don't vaccinate and they get something like the mumps, measles,etc? I welcome ALL comments. I appreciate your imput. Thanks!
Sincerely, Taz
At April 29, 2009 9:07 AM , Jessica said...

I just wanted to say thank you to the Sears' for posting all of this information and for writing the book(s). I am a new mom of a 10 week old boy. I have not yet started vaccines for him but will next week. I feel this information has educated me enough to make an informed and propper decision for his long term health. I appreciate that it is seemingly nonbiased information. I am going to put my boy on a sort of hybred between your selective vaccination schedule and your alternative vaccine schedule. I am glad that there are options out there besides what the mainstream medical community is telling us. My basic thought is that the idea of potential side effects is frightening but some of the postential problems from the diseases themselves are as or even more frightening. I believe as parents we have a duty to make the propper costomized decision for each child. Vaccines should be as any other medical treatment or proceedure....taken on a need to basis. I am happy that in my community we have a small clinic that is willing to work with me on my decisions. My final comment is that I hope one day there will be conclusive evidence on the causes of autism and other developmental problems but until then I owe it to my child to make the best decision for him.
At June 7, 2009 6:46 AM , Naj from Oz said...

I have to admit, asking a doctor/nurse about vaccines is like asking a dirty question. As a concerned mum(yes I am from Australia), I feel as though this is my right. Furthermore, it is TRUE, that most doctors do not know whats in the vaccines, nor have they been taught on the contrary. As when we were considering vaccinating my son, NOT one doctor, nurse Pediatrician could tell me the chemical composition. This is where anyone should base their decision on. THUS, we need to know whats in them and no one could tell me. I do feel that it is negligent of them for not knowing the issues about aluminium and children with kidney damage. i have been practically forced to vaccinate my son, when they are themselves worried about his kidneys( has has had 2 UTI's, one of which spread to his blood). So, I am really grateful that I didnt succumb to the pressure, as these vaccines could have really hurt/ or even worse killed my son. I am going to confront ALL my doctors about this soon. I will keep you posted.

AND for ALL you really passionate woman, who seem to be angry. I COMPLETELY agree with you. BUT, BUT, BUT, it is important to note that DR Sears will not make any headway for us by coming on that strong. IT simply will not work. However, a diplomatic approach may make some grounds for us. AND, SOCIETY ARE SIMPLY NOT READY to hear it any other way.....