- Pregnancy & Childbirth
- Attachment Parenting
- Family Nutrition
- Family Wellness
Thursday, December 6, 2007
In an exclusive interview with Newsweek.com, Dr. Bob addresses the question “Should state governments have the right to make vaccines mandatory?”
The state of Maryland sued a couple thousand parents and students who had declined chickenpox and hepatitis B vaccines, literally forcing the parents to decide between having their pre-teens vaccinated for these diseases or face stiff fines. Maryland state law dictates that vaccines are mandatory, unless a family has religious objections. 29 other states have similar laws, while 20 states allow parents to decline vaccines simply for personal reasons.
This case raises the question, should states have the right to force vaccination? Personally, I say no. Vaccines should be a personal medical decision that every family living in a free country should have the right to make. Having said that, I must admit that if there were a very serious and contagious disease spreading through the country killing a considerable amount of people, I might agree that in this situation it might be a good idea for the government to insist on vaccinations for the public good, IF the public good is threatened.
In the case of hepatitis B and chickenpox, however, I can’t really say that these two diseases threaten public safety. Sure, hep B is bad, but it’s a sexually transmitted disease. So there are ways to prevent it and protect yourself, OR choose vaccination. And since chickenpox only kills about 1 in 65,000 people who catch it, you can’t really say that’s a threat to public safety either.
Hopefully more and more states will follow the example of us Californians (and 19 other states) and allow parents free choice in this matter.